Résumé

This research studies, from a comparative perspective and with a
particular reference to the French bicentennial bicameral experience,
the causes that led to the abolition of the parliamentary upper
chambers in Egypt and Tunisia. Though both countries opted for the
same unicameral choice in their current constitutions, adopted in
2014, the sociopolitical outcomes of such a choice are not the same.
Actually, the unicameral Tunisian parliament seems better adapted to
the sociopolitical context, while Egypt hassubstituted an inefficient
bicameralism with an inadequate unicameralism.

Information

Item Type:	Journal
Divisions:	» EL BAHITH journal in legal and political sciences
ePrint ID:	2142
Date Deposited:	2020-03-10
Further Information:	Google Scholar
URI:	https://www.univ-soukahras.dz/fr/publication/article/2142

BibTex